Note 7 was sacrificed, but Samsung Saved




     Crisis may ruin a company’s yearly-built brand image, if it wasn’t’ managed wisely and timely. A crisis, like Samsung Galaxy 7 Crisis Communication, according to Suzanne Tavani in Tavani Strategic Communications, is more than just PR but rather to be related with the business strategy management and reflective of an organization’s leadership (Alina Wheeler, 88).

       Within weeks of launching its flagship smartphone, the Galaxy Note 7, the company later had to recall all of them, more than 3 million devices it sold, after the reports of overheating and exploding batteries. Soon after, it halted production and scrapped the products entirely (David Gilbert, 2016). As estimated, current estimates indicate the recall’s cost will exceed $6 billion (with one estimate even higher). Moreover, Samsung also updated and posted the continuous latest news of the products on official Twitters and Facebook to inform and make apology to the customers. But the greater concern is about the long-term impact on Samsung’s brand. After all, it is one of the most valuable global brands. Branding consultancy Inter-brand estimated Samsung’s 2016 brand value at $51.8 billion. (Dholakia, 2016) From a crisis management perspective, Samsung were carrying a designed crisis communications plan. And step one, a quick apology and production withdraw is to communicate with the customers with the updated issues strategically, following with other steps that with the answers on the media and public quickly and helpfully.


         So, whether Samsung could survive in the long run since it has sacrificed the new Galaxy 7 series? The answer would be correct with no hesitate. Though no organization could estimate the potential impact of the crisis of the brand, the media and public have short memories and remember how it was solved. The loyal base of existing customer will insulate and forgive the brand. Since Samsung’s quick response given strong customer satisfaction with the Note line, plus loyalty to other Samsung products, this customer base will put the Note 7 fiasco behind it quite quickly. ( MAHESHWARI, 2016) Also, geographically identified brands bounce usually bounce back quickly as Samsung used to be the pride of South Korea. And these effects spill over to other customer groups. Last but not least, the crisis only credited to a single Samsung product and is self-contained. Thus, the impact of the crisis will be expected to reduce with the launch of Note 8 in the future.











References:

1. Designing Brand Identity, Alina Wheeler, the 4th edition, 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey
2. Samsung Sacrificed the Note 7 to Save the Company, John Jacobs, 10-14-2016, Times,  http://time.com/4531372/samsung-note-7-recall-fires-overheating-why/
3. Samsung's £16bn problem: The long-term impact of the exploding Galaxy Note 7, David Gilbert, 09-16-2016, Technology
 4. Samsung’s Response to Galaxy Note 7 Crisis Draws Criticism, SAPNA MAHESHWARI, 10-11-2016, NYtimes,
5. Wells Fargo, Samsung and the importance for crisis communications plans, Manzer Communications,
6. Why Samsung’s Note 7 Crisis Won’t Hurt Its Brand Long Term, Utpal M. Dholakia, 10-26-2016,

Comments

Popular Posts